| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2011 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2011 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 107.1 in | -2 in |
| Length | 183.3 in | 188.1 in | -4.8 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 73.9 in | -3 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 55.6 in | 10.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3274 lb. | 3453 lb. | -179 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.6 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 0.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.6 in | 38.5 in | 2.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.4 in | 55.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.6 in | 53.4 in | -0.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 42.4 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 34.7 in | 3.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 51.6 in | 4.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.7 in | 46.8 in | 4.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 29.8 in | 7.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.7 in | 0.0 in | 35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 50.6 in | 0.0 in | 50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 39.4 in | 0.0 in | 39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 28.2 in | 0.0 in | 28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 34.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.3 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | -3.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 34.2 ft3 | 13.4 | 20.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.3 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 49.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Mustang
| 2011 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
