Model Year | 2007 | 2013 | |
Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Nissan Versa | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,641 mm | 4,455 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,801 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,679 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,600 kg | 1,068 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 41 L | 22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,222 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 940 mm | 33 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,173 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 940 mm | -5 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,265 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 993 mm | 0 mm | 993 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 419 L | 3 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,025 L | 14.8 | -13.8 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,056 L | 14.8 | -12.8 L |
2007 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
nice support for tall person and confy seating see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD |
was more comdfortable, easier entry and exiting, more shoulder hip and head room than most othersreguardless of what other manufacturers specs stated. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD |
more leg and shoulder room than most. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Adjustable, reclinable rear seat is very roomy and comfortable. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2013 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2014 | 0 | I was expecting zero room in the back, but I sat in the backseat even with the drivers seat adjusted far back (I'm 5'11" but long legs and tend to adjust seats to the back end of their travel), I had reasonable legroom for a very compact car. The seat covering material was pleasant as well. see full Nissan Versa review |
2013 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Even with the front seats slid all the way back, this car still has more room than almost any other car -- almost as much room as a BMW 780IL. see full Nissan Versa review |
2012 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 CVT FWD |
Only subcompact we test drove that could actually fit four adults. More rear leg room than many midsize cars. see full Nissan Versa review |
2013 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
When I bought the car, I laid the seat down all the way to make sure it would be comfortable enough to nap on. It is, but it's slightly more comfortable if the car is parked on an incline because the seat doesn't quite go down completely flat... although come to think of it I haven't tried raising the seat height with the lever then setting the seat back. Anyway, the passenger side doesn't have a seat height adjustment lever and it doesn't quite make a 180% flat angle either. see full Nissan Versa review |