| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2006 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 164 hp@7600 126 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 102.4 in | 2.7 in |
| Length | 183.3 in | 171.3 in | 12 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 69.9 in | 1 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 61.6 in | 4.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3571 lb. | 2800 lb. | 771 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.6 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 3.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.6 in | 40.6 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.4 in | 53.2 in | 3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.6 in | 51.7 in | 0.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 41.8 in | -0.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 39.8 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 52.6 in | 3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.7 in | 47.8 in | 3.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 36.3 in | 1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.7 in | 0.0 in | 35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 50.6 in | 0.0 in | 50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 39.4 in | 0.0 in | 39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 28.2 in | 0.0 in | 28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | 78.1 in (over 2 rows) | 28.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.3 ft3 | 21.8 ft3 | -11.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 34.2 ft3 | 21.8 | 12.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.3 ft3 | 53.2 ft3 | 10.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Matrix
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room in rear seats while both front seats are being used, enough room for 5 adults. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
