| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2006 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 167 kW@6250 291 Nm@3750 |
1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 122 kW@7600 171 Nm@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,656 mm | 4,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,620 kg | 1,270 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 50 L | 13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,336 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 1,011 mm | 974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,313 mm | 1,214 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 922 mm | 25 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 907 mm | 0 mm | 907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,001 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 716 mm | 0 mm | 716 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 292 L | 617 L | -325 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 968 L | 21.8 | 946.2 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 1,506 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Matrix
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room in rear seats while both front seats are being used, enough room for 5 adults. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
