| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2012 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,656 mm | 4,366 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,485 kg | 1,300 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 50 L | 13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,336 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 998 mm | -23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,313 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 919 mm | 28 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 907 mm | 0 mm | 907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,001 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 716 mm | 0 mm | 716 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 292 L | 561 L | -269 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 968 L | 19.8 | 948.2 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 1,741 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Matrix
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
