| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Nissan Armada and 2010 Acura TSX Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
| Model | Nissan Armada | Acura TSX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,708 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,276 mm | 4,729 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,014 mm | 1,842 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,961 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,405 kg | 1,542 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 70 L | 36 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,651 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 940 mm | -939 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,651 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,544 mm | 1,377 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 871 mm | -870 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 357 L | 209 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 12.6 | -11.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 12.6 | -10.6 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Nissan Armada
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Nissan Armada.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Acura TSX
| 2010 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Drove 4 straight hours in these seats. They hug in corners and don't leave you butt feeling numb even after long drives. Not many seats out there that are more comfortable (Volvo is one of the makers that comes to mind with better seats) see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats can be a little tight for people on the tallish side (for me, anything above 5'10"). This can get more complicated with a tall driver/front passenger and tall rear seat occupants. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The trunk space is adequate, but get a hatchback or wagon (or SUV if you're into that sort of thing) if you're going to regularly carrying anything more than the usual grocery bags, suitcases, golf bags, etc. That said, the 60/40 split fold rear seats will allow for surprisingly longish items to fit (managed a 6 foot ladder, barely). see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The rear seats are fairly comfortable, but they only provide about 34" of legroom, and there is very little clearance below the seats. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
If the front seats are pushed back, not a lot of foot room in back see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
There could have been a bit more rear leg space - althoug, the seats are pretty comfortable. see full Acura TSX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
