Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
Model | Nissan Armada | Chevrolet Malibu | |
Engine | 5.6L V8 DOHC-4v 317 hp@4900 385 lb-ft@3600 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 259 hp@5500 295 lb-ft@3000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,738 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,255 mm | 4,864 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,002 mm | 1,854 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,976 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,382 kg | 1,649 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 70 L | 36 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,654 mm | 1,461 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 953 mm | -952 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,638 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,527 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 935 mm | -934 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 462 L | 104 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 16.3 | -15.3 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 16.3 | -14.3 L |
2007 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
2007 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not enough legroom and headroom in 3rd row seat. see full Nissan Armada review |
2015 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | Chevrolet's designers styled the new Malibu's instrument panel to appear low and out of the way, such that the front seat feels especially roomy and the view forward seems more open than in most competitors, including the Kia (the instrument panel in which seems significantly higher and more imposing). In the tested car, which had every option except the panoramic sunroof, headroom was so abundant I could have worn a fedora. The Kia Optima might have as much front headroom when similarly without a sunroof. The official specs, which often don't reflect real world differences, suggest it should have even more than the Malibu. But you cannot get a highly equipped Optima without the sunroof, as it's part of a large package on the SX and standard on the SX Limited. Though the Malibu's windshield is relatively large, you won't find outward visibility among the reasons to buy one. The Chevrolet's front pillars remain on the thick side, its instrument panel is considerably deeper than the Kia's, and the view to the sides and rear also could be more open. In the Optima, the view to the sides is more open but that to the rear is not. I did find the Cherolet's front seats more form-fitting and comfortable than the Optima's. The Kia's quilted seats aren't as cushy as they appear. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |
2015 Chevrolet Malibu Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2014 | 4dr Sedan 196-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Both front & rear compartments very roomy & comfortable. Again, this is noted improvement over our 2009 Malibu. see full Chevrolet Malibu review |