| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Nissan Armada and 2016 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2016 | |
| Model | Nissan Armada | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,649 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,276 mm | 4,409 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,014 mm | 1,829 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,961 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,405 kg | 1,636 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 51 L | 55 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,651 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,651 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,544 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 927 mm | -926 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 694 L | -128 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 24.5 | -23.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 1,489 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Nissan Armada
| 2008 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not enough legroom and headroom in 3rd row seat. see full Nissan Armada review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
