| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Nissan Armada and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Nissan Armada | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,255 mm | 4,783 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,002 mm | 1,915 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,976 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,382 kg | 1,599 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 61 L | 45 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,654 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,638 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,527 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 777 mm | -776 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 382 L | 184 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Armada
| 2006 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
| 2006 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not enough legroom and headroom in 3rd row seat. see full Nissan Armada review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
