| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Nissan Armada and 2012 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2012 | |
| Model | Nissan Armada | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,255 mm | 4,778 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,002 mm | 1,877 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,976 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,382 kg | 1,564 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 61 L | 45 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,654 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 881 mm | -880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,638 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,527 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 757 mm | -756 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 379 L | 187 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 13.4 | -12.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 13.4 | -11.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Nissan Armada
| 2007 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
| 2007 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not enough legroom and headroom in 3rd row seat. see full Nissan Armada review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
