| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Nissan JUKE and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2018 | |
| Model | Nissan JUKE | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 99.6 in | 106.2 in | -6.6 in |
| Length | 162.4 in | 179.1 in | -16.7 in |
| Width | 69.5 in | 72.5 in | -3 in |
| Height | 61.8 in | 65.3 in | -3.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 2828 lb. | 3563 lb. | -735 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 12.1 gal. | 14.8 gal. | -2.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 39.7 in | -1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.6 in | 57.1 in | -3.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.2 in | -55.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 41.0 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.7 in | 39.0 in | -2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.4 in | 54.8 in | -3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.3 in | -55.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.1 in | 39.6 in | -7.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 74.2 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -6.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.9 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -22 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 29.3 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -30.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Nissan JUKE
| 2012 Nissan JUKE Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Plenty of room in the front. see full Nissan JUKE review |
| 2012 Nissan JUKE Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
If there are leggy people in the front the room in the back goes to almost non-existant. The head room is limited for taller people as well. see full Nissan JUKE review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
The back seat is useless for adults. At 6' tall I couldn't sit in the back because my head would hit the roof. see full Nissan JUKE review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
The front seats are great for short trips, but found them rather hard and uncomfortable for longer trips. Not usually a problem as you have to stop every two hundred miles to fill it up again. see full Nissan JUKE review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
