We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan LEAF vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Chart is based on 3 fuel economy reports for the Nissan LEAF and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Nissan LEAF MPG

Nissan LEAF Nissan LEAF 2011 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2011 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
hills med light 15 5 10 70 65 5.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan LEAF fuel economy data.

Nissan LEAF Electric Fuel Economy

Nissan LEAF Nissan LEAF 2012 22.8 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Nissan LEAF Nissan LEAF 2011 31.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2012 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 0 0 30 70 65 22.8  
2011 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
flat v.lt none 0 0 20 80 70 31.6  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan LEAF fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 29.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 31.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 27.7 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 32.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 33.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 21.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 19.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 20.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 29.2  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 26.4  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 20.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 21.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 25.7  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 31.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 25.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 27.7  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 23.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 25.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 29.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 27.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 30.5  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 21.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 29.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 25.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 32.4  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 21.7  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 23.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 25.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 33.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 21.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 22.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 22.1  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 23.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 27.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 26.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 28.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Nissan LEAF vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Nissan LEAF and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models and Mitsubishi models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan LEAF

Nissan LEAF Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
At my present rate of .088 per kilowat this car has cost 2.2 cents per mile. see full Nissan LEAF review
2012 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
You will NEVER fill up with stinky gas at a gas station again ... you'll only stop at a gas station to use the washroom and get a coffee. However, on the subject of "fuel", it is very efficient with the clean electrons. And the feedback is excellent. You always have access to how well you're driving technique is. Plus, you get more information when you look it up on Nissan's LEAF website of your personal driving efficiency and how you did relative to other LEAF drivers in your country or around the world. When comparing purchase prices or lease payments, you must take into consideration that your electric bill will be ONE-TENTH the price of your gas guzzler's gas bill. That means that your $300 per month gas credit card expense will become a mere $30 on your electric bill. see full Nissan LEAF review
2011 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
Less than $.03/mile for electricity. see full Nissan LEAF review
2011 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
Obviously, Fuel economy is one of the Leaf's strongest features. The car gets amazing milage. The Battery is 24Kw and I pay 10 cents per kilowatt where I live in Texas. This means that it costs about $2.40 to charge it up completely from empty. From empty I can get about 75 miles of normal highway/city mixed driving. My previous car, a Chrysler Sebring Limited convertible got 23 miles per gallon. So it would take me about 3.2 gallons of gas to go 75 miles in my Sebring. At $3.50 per gallon it would cost me $11.41 to go that same 75 miles in my Sebring that only costs me $2.40 in my Leaf. The price of gas would have to be 75 cents per gallon for my sebring just to match cost of the feul to drive the same distance as my Leaf. I doubt we'll ever see that price again. see full Nissan LEAF review
Nissan LEAF Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Hatch 107-horsepower Electric
1-speed automatic FWD
Fuel Economy is the closest category I found for "Range". Fully charged the LEAF says it will travel 100 miles, and in the right conditions (35 miles per hour with minimal stopping) it probably would go 100 miles. For normal driving, I'd say the range is 75 miles, unless the heater is on, then that could drop to about 50 - 60 miles. My commute to work is short and I wanted this car for local travel, to the grocery store, Costco, etc, and for that purpose it works well. Unfortunately in my town there is only one place that has a charging station and that is the Nissan Dealer. If I travel outside of town, I need to find a charging station or be sure I am within 35 miles from home. When I have to travel to Corporate I have to take one of our Gas Cars, since it is on the outskirts of my 35 mile range. To fully charge the car it takes 3 hours, which limits my destination. see full Nissan LEAF review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review