| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Nissan Maxima and 2016 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Nissan Maxima | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 216 kW@6400 354 Nm@4400 |
1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 71 kW@5200 142 Nm@3600 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable CVT | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,841 mm | 4,539 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,859 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,468 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,613 kg | 1,395 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 43 L | 33 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,001 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,113 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 950 mm | -25 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,400 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 848 mm | 31 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,991 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 402 L | 697 L | -295 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 | 1,775 L | 13.2 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Nissan Maxima
| 2011 Nissan Maxima Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
Lumbar in the base model. Good side bolstering on bottom cushion and through the shoulders. Large range of adjustment and the wheel tilts and shifts. see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
Lots of room, soft seats. see full Nissan Maxima review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
