Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2006 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2014

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Titan (2006) vs. Ford Mustang (2014) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Nissan Titan and 2014 Ford Mustang specs.

2006 Nissan Titan and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2006 2014  
Model Nissan Titan Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Titan

2006 Nissan Titan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
The captain chairs are far and away more comfortable than bench seats. see full Nissan Titan review
2006 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
Same as the front, lots of room for full size adults. see full Nissan Titan review
2006 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
Huge back seat. Very comfortable for any size adult. see full Nissan Titan review
2005 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
Plenty of leg room and most usable room with seats folded up. Seats folded up out of the way instead of folding down using up floor to ceiling room. see full Nissan Titan review
2006 Nissan Titan Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
The rear bench is simply uncomfortable. Long trips (an hour or longer) are not recommended in the back seat. see full Nissan Titan review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang

2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang

2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.