We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Titan vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 46 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Titan and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Nissan Titan g/100m

Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2018 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2010 7.8 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2010 6.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2009 6.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2009 6.5 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2008.5 7.8 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2008 7.8 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2007 6.8 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2007 6.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2007 6.7 MPG Highway Percentage 86 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2006 29.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2006 6.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2006 13.5 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2005 5.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2005 8.4 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2005 6.3 MPG Highway Percentage 46 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2004 6.9 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Nissan Titan Nissan Titan 2004 7.7 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2018 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 390-horsepower 5.6L V8
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 0 90 70 4.5  
2010 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 0 50 13 37 70 7.8  
2010 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med hvy 25 25 0 50 75 6.9  
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 10 10 40 40 70 6.3  
2009 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med light 0 33 43 25 73 6.5  
2008.5 4dr Crew Cab 7ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 10 20 40 30 75 7.8  
2008 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 50 30 20 60 7.8  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 8 45 20 28 70 6.8  
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 0 50 0 50 65 6.7  
2007 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills light none 1 6 7 86 64 6.7  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 13 30 23 33 120 29.7  
2006 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 11 39 20 30 76 6.7  
2006 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med light 6 13 35 47 73 13.5  
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 13 0 8 80 63 5.9  
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 5 20 40 35 75 8.4  
2005 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med hvy 9 15 30 46 70 6.3  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light light 8 10 19 64 70 6.9  
2004 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light hvy 0 0 65 35 60 7.7  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Titan fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer g/100m

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 5.3 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 3.4 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 17.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 10.3 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 3.6 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 15.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 11.7 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 13.7 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 3.1 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 4.6 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 3.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 25.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 4.2 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 4.7  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 5.3  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 4.9  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 3.4  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 3.8  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 5.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 26.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 4.0  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 17.6  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 3.9  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 20.0  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 4.3  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 4.0  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 10.3  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 3.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 15.0  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 11.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 11.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 13.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 3.1  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 4.6  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 4.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 9.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 3.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 4.8  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 4.5  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 25.0  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 4.2  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 3.7  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 3.8  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 3.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Nissan Titan vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Nissan Titan and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models and Mitsubishi models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Titan

Nissan Titan Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
While not as bad as, say the original Hummer, punching the accelerator will cost you. see full Nissan Titan review
2006 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
Poor fuel economy. I average 15 miles/gallon mixed city highway. see full Nissan Titan review
2006 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Fuel economy is decent on the hwy but poor in the city!!! see full Nissan Titan review
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
15mpg on highway see full Nissan Titan review
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
not even close to advertised. see full Nissan Titan review
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
thirsty. see full Nissan Titan review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review