| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Nissan Versa and 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Nissan Versa | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 108.5 in | -6.1 in |
| Length | 169.1 in | 178.3 in | -9.2 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 74.3 in | -7.6 in |
| Height | 60.4 in | 66.9 in | -6.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 2722 lb. | 4079 lb. | -1357 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 17.4 gal. | -4.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.6 in | 39.8 in | 0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.5 in | 55.2 in | -1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 48.8 in | 53.2 in | -4.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 41.4 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 39.7 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 50.7 in | 55.4 in | -4.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.2 in | 52.5 in | -5.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 35.1 in | 2.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.4 in (over 2 rows) | 76.5 in (over 2 rows) | 2.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 17.8 ft3 | 23.3 ft3 | -5.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 50.4 ft3 | 54.7 ft3 | -4.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Nissan Versa
| 2011 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 CVT FWD |
Only subcompact we test drove that could actually fit four adults. More rear leg room than many midsize cars. see full Nissan Versa review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The seats were ample, and well supported. In my last two cars (a Corolla and a Legacy) I needed a lumbar cushion, but not in the Versa. The seat bottoms also supported my thighs for enough of their length for comfort. see full Nissan Versa review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
