| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Nissan Versa and 2015 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
| Model | Nissan Versa | Volvo V60 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 109.3 in | -6.9 in |
| Length | 175.4 in | 182.5 in | -7.1 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 73.4 in | -6.7 in |
| Height | 59.6 in | 58.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 2354 lb. | 3527 lb. | -1173 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.8 gal. | 17.8 gal. | -7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 38.7 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 51.7 in | 57.0 in | -5.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 48.1 in | 54.9 in | -6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.9 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 37.4 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.9 in | 55.2 in | -3.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.2 in | 53.5 in | -7.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 33.5 in | 3.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 3.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 14.8 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | -0.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.8 ft3 | 43.8 ft3 | -29 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Nissan Versa
| 2013 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 0 | I was expecting zero room in the back, but I sat in the backseat even with the drivers seat adjusted far back (I'm 5'11" but long legs and tend to adjust seats to the back end of their travel), I had reasonable legroom for a very compact car. The seat covering material was pleasant as well. see full Nissan Versa review |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Even with the front seats slid all the way back, this car still has more room than almost any other car -- almost as much room as a BMW 780IL. see full Nissan Versa review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 CVT FWD |
Only subcompact we test drove that could actually fit four adults. More rear leg room than many midsize cars. see full Nissan Versa review |
| 2013 Nissan Versa Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 109-horsepower 1.6L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
When I bought the car, I laid the seat down all the way to make sure it would be comfortable enough to nap on. It is, but it's slightly more comfortable if the car is parked on an incline because the seat doesn't quite go down completely flat... although come to think of it I haven't tried raising the seat height with the lever then setting the seat back. Anyway, the passenger side doesn't have a seat height adjustment lever and it doesn't quite make a 180% flat angle either. see full Nissan Versa review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volvo V60
| 2015 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review | |
| 2015 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Volvo V60.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
