| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z and 2009 Acura TSX Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2009 | |
| Model | Nissan 350Z / 370Z | Acura TSX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 100.4 in | 106.6 in | -6.2 in |
| Length | 167.2 in | 186.2 in | -19 in |
| Width | 72.8 in | 72.5 in | 0.3 in |
| Height | 51.9 in | 56.7 in | -4.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3232 lb. | 3400 lb. | -168 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | 0.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.2 in | 37.6 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.4 in | 57.8 in | -3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 55.6 in | -1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.9 in | 42.4 in | 0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 37.0 in | -37 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.1 in | -56.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 54.2 in | -54.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 34.3 in | -34.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.9 in (over 1 rows) | 76.7 in (over 2 rows) | -33.8 in |
| Cargo Volume | 6.9 ft3 | 12.6 ft3 | -5.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z
| 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Hatch 332-horsepower 3.7L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
It was a two seater, and I enjoy driving with people around. see full Nissan 350Z / 370Z review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch 306-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
very cramped, not designed for very long rides. Not for tall people. see full Nissan 350Z / 370Z review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Acura TSX
| 2009 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Drove 4 straight hours in these seats. They hug in corners and don't leave you butt feeling numb even after long drives. Not many seats out there that are more comfortable (Volvo is one of the makers that comes to mind with better seats) see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats can be a little tight for people on the tallish side (for me, anything above 5'10"). This can get more complicated with a tall driver/front passenger and tall rear seat occupants. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The trunk space is adequate, but get a hatchback or wagon (or SUV if you're into that sort of thing) if you're going to regularly carrying anything more than the usual grocery bags, suitcases, golf bags, etc. That said, the 60/40 split fold rear seats will allow for surprisingly longish items to fit (managed a 6 foot ladder, barely). see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The rear seats are fairly comfortable, but they only provide about 34" of legroom, and there is very little clearance below the seats. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
If the front seats are pushed back, not a lot of foot room in back see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
There could have been a bit more rear leg space - althoug, the seats are pretty comfortable. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 205-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Smaller than comparably priced sedans. see full Acura TSX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
