| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Nissan cube and 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2014 | |
| Model | Nissan cube | BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 99.6 in | 115.0 in | -15.4 in |
| Length | 156.5 in | 190.0 in | -33.5 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 72.0 in | -5.3 in |
| Height | 65.0 in | 59.4 in | 5.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 2762 lb. | 3915 lb. | -1153 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 15.8 gal. | -2.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 42.6 in | 41.3 in | 1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.2 in | 55.2 in | -3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 48.8 in | 0.0 in | 48.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.0 in | 0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.2 in | 38.3 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.4 in | 54.1 in | -1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.6 in | 0.0 in | 47.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 39.2 in | -3.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.9 in (over 2 rows) | 81.2 in (over 2 rows) | -3.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 11.4 ft3 | 18.3 ft3 | -6.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.4 | 18.4 ft3 | -7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 58.1 ft3 | 56.5 ft3 | 1.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan cube
| 2010 Nissan cube Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD |
Unparalleled rear seat room and comfort in this car for passengers. Should be among the easier cars of this size to put a baby seat into the back, if we have children. Our (longer and lower) 2004 Sentra paled in comparison of back seat usability. see full Nissan cube review |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD |
Adults can sit there in comfort. see full Nissan cube review |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD |
SEATS ARE COMFY FOR LONG TRIPS. DO NOT BEAT THE HELL OUT OF YOU. see full Nissan cube review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
| 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Though the latest 3-Series has a much roomier back seat than its predecessors, many people still find it insufficient for their needs, and step up to a midsize sedan or wagon such as the 5-Series or E-Class. Well, most of the 3-Series Gran Turismo's wheelbase stretch was put towards rear seat legroom, bumping it from 35.0 to 37.9 inches. Though a larger car, the E-Class has nearly four inches less total legroom--barely more than the 3 wagon, in fact. (But with a more comfortably positioned rear seat than the 3 wagon.) What the specs don't tell you is that the 3 GT's rear seat cushion, since it is positioned much higher than that in the wagons, provides better thigh support and a much more open view forward. To top it off, the 3 GT's rear seat back reclines. Here again, though, the E-Class wagon has a trick bonus: a rear-facing third-row seat. Though there's not enough headroom back there for anyone over 5-4, the seat is well-padded. If you want to seat seven in a pinch, the E-Class wagon is your only option with a sedan-like driving position (aside from the Tesla Model S). Update: this review originally stated that the 3GT has much more shoulder room than the regular 3-Series, and about as much as the E-Class. But it seems that the initial specs were inaccurate. The latest specs suggest shoulder room in the 3GT is about the same as that in the regular 3-Series. Its interior does feel significantly roomier, though, so the initial specs could yet provide the more accurate set. see full BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
