| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Pontiac Montana SV6 and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
| Model | Pontiac Montana SV6 | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,076 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,222 mm | 4,783 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,829 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,829 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,985 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L | 61 L | 34 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,521 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,394 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 884 mm | 104 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,554 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,204 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 777 mm | 211 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 0 mm | 968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,234 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 919 mm | 0 mm | 919 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,921 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 762 L | 382 L | 380 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,110 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,865 L | 13.5 | -10.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Pontiac Montana SV6
| 2006 Pontiac Montana SV6 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Front seats are very comfortable and roomy compared to the Chrysler Town and Country see full Pontiac Montana SV6 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Pontiac models.
