MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us
Sign up your car for the TrueDelta survey and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!

Saturn Outlook and Mitsubishi Lancer Lemon Odds and Nada Odds for the Year Ending June 30, 2018

An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.

Switch to bar graph

Year Make/Model Nada Odds per 100 Cars Lemon Odds per 100 Cars    
32 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 103100 miles driven2009 Saturn Outlook Join or sign in to view   see reported repairs
  32 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 103100 miles driven
44 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 125100 miles driven

Multiple reports of transmission wave plate failures earlier.2008		 Saturn Outlook
[?] see reported repairs
  44 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 125100 miles driven

Multiple reports of transmission wave plate failures earlier.

Return to top

Saturn Outlook vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Lemon Odds and Nada Odds

Other sources of Saturn Outlook and Mitsubishi Lancer reliability data provide only averages, which can conceal as much as they reveal. So we also report the percentage of Saturn Outlooks and Mitsubishi Lancers with no repairs at all in the past year and the percentage of Saturn Outlooks and Mitsubishi Lancers that are lemons (required three or more repair trips in the past year). These figures might surprise you.

These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to closely track Saturn Outlook and Mitsubishi Lancer lemon odds as the cars age. Others can be over a year behind. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Saturn Outlook and Mitsubishi Lancer have been recently.

To see how frequently Saturn Outlook and Mitsubishi Lancer problems occur, check out our car reliability stats.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Brand Reputation of the Saturn Outlook

Saturn Outlook Brand Reputation: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV 275-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 Saturn is a "New Kid on the Block", so they try harder to please(with great success). see full Saturn Outlook review
Saturn Outlook Brand Reputation: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 Saturn has a spotty reliability history. Their smallest cars have faired well but all others have been typical GM with some major flaws. see full Saturn Outlook review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Brand Reputation of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Cons
YearComment
Partly because Mitsubishi has had to rely heavily on incentives to sell outdated cars, and partly because people wonder if it'll be able to hang on much longer (if they realize it's still around at all), its brand image isn't the best. Personally, I don't expect Mitsubishi Motors to go away. If weak sales and financial losses could kill the company, or at least its American subsidiary, it would already be dead. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Brand Reputation of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 20+ Years of Rally Experience, a great design team, bringing some flare to the econobox class of cars in the Nation. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 rally race proven see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 Face it, this is a Mitsubishi, a struggling brand with some very poor models dragging it down. This may affect resale value and as of 2012 Mitsubishi's future in the US is still uncertain. The Lancer is a great car but the overall brand is struggling. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review