| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2002 Saturn S-Series and 2010 Mercury Milan Specifications
| Model Year | 2002 | 2010 | |
| Model | Saturn S-Series | Mercury Milan | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Saturn S-Series
| 2002 Saturn S-Series Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 100-horsepower 1.9L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I am six feet tall and I have the driver's seat pushed back as far as it will go. If my legs were any longer I would need more room. For anybody six feet or shorter or who has short legs for their height, the car is perfectly fine. see full Saturn S-Series review |
| 2002 | 4dr Coupe 124-horsepower 1.9L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I expected the rear seat room to be similar to the sedan since they are built on the same wheelbase - this is not the case. Swooping roof line - a 6+ footer (myself) cannot sit without head hitting headliner! see full Saturn S-Series review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercury Milan
| 2010 Mercury Milan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I needed to fit 3 child car seats in the back, which it does better than my VW Passat it replaced. see full Mercury Milan review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Saturn models.
