| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Subaru Forester and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
| Model | Subaru Forester | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,525 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,486 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,735 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,651 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,436 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 61 L | -1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,359 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,311 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,107 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,361 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,311 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 856 mm | 777 mm | 79 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,963 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 906 L | 382 L | 524 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,634 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Subaru Forester
| 2007 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
easy to find comfortable position; no problems driving over an hour or more; good upright position see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Front driver leg room is a little cramped from side to side. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
No thigh or lumbar support, seats hrad, minimal leg room for front passenger see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Not acceptable for an adult in any of the three rear seating positions see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Again, cramped and too small for larger people. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
This is honesty the only complaint i have about the 2006 XT. The rear seat is a bit tight. We took three other adults on about a 4 hour trip and it was a tight fit - good thing we're good friends! My wife's 2009 Forester is much better in the rear legroom department. see full Subaru Forester review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
