Subaru Forester Subaru Forester 2018 GMC Terrain GMC Terrain 2018

We are 106,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Subaru Forester vs. GMC Terrain Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2018 Subaru Forester and 2018 GMC Terrain specs.

Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.

2018 Subaru Forester and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year 2018 2018  
Model Subaru Forester GMC Terrain  
Engine turbocharged
2.0L H4
DOHC-4v
250 hp@5600
258 lb-ft@2000
turbocharged
2.0L I4
DOHC-4v
252 hp@5500
260 lb-ft@2500
 
Transmission 8-speed shiftable CVT 9-speed shiftable automatic  
Drivetrain AWD 4WD  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 103.9 in 107.3 in -3.4 in
Length 180.9 in 182.3 in -1.4 in
Width 70.7 in 72.4 in -1.7 in
Height 66.4 in 65.4 in 1 in
Curb Weight 3653 lb. 3756 lb. -103 lb.
Fuel Capacity 15.9 gal. 14.9 gal. 1 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 41.4 in 40.0 in 1.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 57.0 in 57.2 in -0.2 in
Hip Room, Row 1 53.9 in 54.4 in -0.5 in
Legroom, Row 1 43.0 in 40.9 in 2.1 in
Headroom, Row 2 39.8 in 38.5 in 1.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 56.5 in 55.6 in 0.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2 53.0 in 51.8 in 1.2 in
Legroom, Row 2 38.0 in 39.7 in -1.7 in
Total Legroom 81 in (over 2 rows) 80.6 in (over 2 rows) 0.4 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 34.4 ft3 29.6 ft3 4.8 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 74.7 ft3 63.3 ft3 11.4 ft3

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Subaru Forester

2018 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2017 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4
8-speed shiftable CVT AWD
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively! - Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better. - Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range. - It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved. - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times! Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT! see full Subaru Forester review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2018 The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.