Subaru Forester Subaru Forester 2006 Toyota Tundra Toyota Tundra 2010

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Subaru Forester (2006) vs. Toyota Tundra (2010) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Subaru Forester and 2010 Toyota Tundra specs.

2006 Subaru Forester and 2010 Toyota Tundra Specifications

Model Year 2006 2010  
Model Subaru Forester Toyota Tundra  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru Forester

2006 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4
4-speed automatic AWD
easy to find comfortable position; no problems driving over an hour or more; good upright position see full Subaru Forester review
2005 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
There is leg room. The seat is adjustable enough. see full Subaru Forester review
2006 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
Front driver leg room is a little cramped from side to side. see full Subaru Forester review
2007 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4
4-speed automatic AWD
No thigh or lumbar support, seats hrad, minimal leg room for front passenger see full Subaru Forester review
2007 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4
4-speed automatic AWD
Not acceptable for an adult in any of the three rear seating positions see full Subaru Forester review
2006 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
Again, cramped and too small for larger people. see full Subaru Forester review
2006 4dr SUV turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
This is honesty the only complaint i have about the 2006 XT. The rear seat is a bit tight. We took three other adults on about a 4 hour trip and it was a tight fit - good thing we're good friends! My wife's 2009 Forester is much better in the rear legroom department. see full Subaru Forester review
2005 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4
4-speed automatic AWD
Rear seat is just too small, but that has been fixed for the 2009 models. The front seat, actually the cabin of the car is just a bit too narrow. It needs more elbow room. see full Subaru Forester review
2005 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4
4-speed automatic AWD
Not enough elbow room. see full Subaru Forester review
2005 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4
4-speed automatic AWD
Rear seat room is a bit tight for larger people. Car seats are a little tight in both rear and forward facing positions. see full Subaru Forester review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Tundra

2010 Toyota Tundra Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Lots of room for my long legs and seat is comfortable for the long haul. see full Toyota Tundra review
2010 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
With the front seat back and back seat forward, still have knee room. The recline on the back seat is great. see full Toyota Tundra review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.