| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota 4Runner and 2012 BMW X3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | BMW X3 | |
| Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@5600 377 Nm@4400 |
3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 179 kW@6600 300 Nm@2750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,809 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 4,648 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,882 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,661 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,865 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 67 L | 24 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,034 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 993 mm | -13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 935 mm | -99 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 782 L | -527 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 27.6 | -26.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 1,792 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota 4Runner
| 2011 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 BMW X3
| 2012 BMW X3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Thanks partly to power-adjustable side bolsters, the X3's optional sport seats are both supportive and comfortable. They're firm where you want them to be firm, yet (unlike those in the Audi and Mercedes-Benz) cushy where you want them to be cushy. The Volvo XC60's seats are also very comfortable, but can't quite match the BMW's lateral support. You sit substantially higher than in a BMW sedan, both relative to the ground and to the instrument panel. The windshield is more distant than in the original X3, making the current one seem considerably larger, but it remains more upright than in most recently designed crossovers. The forward visibility many people buy a crossover to get can be gotten here. Rear seat legroom increased by an inch with the 2011 redesign, and is now competitive. A couple of adults will fit, so there's no compelling functional reason to step up to the X5 unless you require tall people to be comfortable back there. see full BMW X3 review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 BMW X3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 BMW X3.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
