Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
Model | Toyota 4Runner | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,831 mm | 5,037 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,925 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,816 mm | 1,778 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 2,022 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 70 L | 17 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,052 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 1,031 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 1,003 mm | 835 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 960 mm | -89 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 846 mm | -102 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,880 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 595 L | -340 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 1,243 L | 0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 2,313 L | 0 L |
2015 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Both the Toyota and Jeep have roomy second-row seats that are high enough off the floor to provide thigh support for adults. Only the Toyota offers an optional third row seat, but it's too tight to be of much use. If you want a useful third row in this sort of vehicle, check out the Dodge Durango. The Durango is essentially an extended, less off-road-capable Grand Cherokee. Its third-row seat is about as comfortable as you'll find in this size SUV or crossover. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota 4Runner.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Explorer.