| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Toyota 4Runner and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 107.1 in | 2.7 in |
| Length | 189.9 in | 188.3 in | 1.6 in |
| Width | 75.8 in | 75.4 in | 0.4 in |
| Height | 71.5 in | 54.4 in | 17.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 4400 lb. | 3526 lb. | 874 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 24.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.3 in | 37.6 in | 1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 56.3 in | 1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 54.9 in | 1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.0 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 34.8 in | 3.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 52.2 in | 5.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.7 in | 47.4 in | 8.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.9 in | 30.6 in | 2.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 34.3 in | 0.0 in | 34.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.7 in | 0.0 in | 57.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.3 in | 0.0 in | 29.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 31.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.0 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | -4.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 46.3 ft3 | 13.5 | 32.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 88.8 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 75.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota 4Runner
| 2013 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Both the Toyota and Jeep have roomy second-row seats that are high enough off the floor to provide thigh support for adults. Only the Toyota offers an optional third row seat, but it's too tight to be of much use. If you want a useful third row in this sort of vehicle, check out the Dodge Durango. The Durango is essentially an extended, less off-road-capable Grand Cherokee. Its third-row seat is about as comfortable as you'll find in this size SUV or crossover. see full Toyota 4Runner review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota 4Runner
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota 4Runner.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
