Model Year | 2015 | 2019 | |
Model | Toyota 4Runner | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@5600 377 Nm@4400 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 186 kW@5000 420 Nm@2000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,831 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,925 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,816 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,735 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 56 L | 31 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,008 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 991 mm | -11 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 1,006 mm | 835 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 875 L | -620 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
2015 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Both the Toyota and Jeep have roomy second-row seats that are high enough off the floor to provide thigh support for adults. Only the Toyota offers an optional third row seat, but it's too tight to be of much use. If you want a useful third row in this sort of vehicle, check out the Dodge Durango. The Durango is essentially an extended, less off-road-capable Grand Cherokee. Its third-row seat is about as comfortable as you'll find in this size SUV or crossover. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota 4Runner.
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.