Model Year | 2014 | 2013 | |
Model | Toyota Avalon | Honda Ridgeline | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 200 kW@6200 336 Nm@4700 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 186 kW@5700 335 Nm@4300 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUT | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 3,099 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,958 mm | 5,253 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,834 mm | 1,938 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,461 mm | 1,786 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,570 kg | 2,043 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 83 L | -19 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,034 mm | 977 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,036 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 993 mm | -30 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 925 mm | 71 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,065 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 453 L | 0.0 | 453 L |
2014 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Compounding the Avalon's lack of suspension compliance, its seats are also firm, yet lacking in lateral support. You very much sit on them rather than in them. On a long drive my rear end reported impinged circulation. The front passenger is even worse off, as the tilt of that seat can be adjusted only in the Limited. Rear seat passengers also complained about overly firm, insufficiently contoured cushions. see full Toyota Avalon review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Toyota Avalon.
2013 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |