| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Toyota Camry and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,879 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,839 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,445 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,470 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 61 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 955 mm | 18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 884 mm | 81 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 777 mm | 188 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 428 L | 382 L | 46 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry
| 2020 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The rear seat is similarly meh. Passengers back there will encounter a decent amount of legroom (much more than in the Mazda6), but (unless they have very short legs) insufficient thigh support and (if they're of above-average height) the headliner. This last is the price of the current Camry's racier roof line. Perhaps they figure people who require a roomy rear seat will buy a crossover. To be fair, many manufacturers have been sacrificing rear seat headroom for a more stylish roof line, as this seems the best way for sedans to retain appeal in a market hot for crossovers. see full Toyota Camry review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
