| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Toyota Camry and 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2008 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,806 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,821 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,447 kg | 1,600 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 66 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 942 mm | 44 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,384 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 968 mm | 937 mm | 31 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,438 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 848 mm | 140 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,045 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 436 L | 351 L | 85 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Toyota Camry
| 2014 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Camry's rear seat isn't quite as roomy as the Accord's but it's close, and both are much roomier than the Ford's. The rear seat cushions in all three sedans are high enough to provide decent thigh support for adults. Missed in the Camry Hybrid SE, though: a rear air vent. If you want one, you'll need a higher trim level--or one of the competitors. see full Toyota Camry review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Toyota Camry
| 2014 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 0 | Nice ergonomic shape, but not enough padding. Leather seats feel decidedly firm after two months of ownership. Seat cushion length should be slightly longer for thigh support. see full Toyota Camry review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
