MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Toyota Celica vs. Land Rover Range Rover Sport Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 4 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Celica and 9 fuel economy reports for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

Toyota Celica g/100m

Toyota Celica Toyota Celica 2002 2.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Toyota Celica Toyota Celica 2002 3.1 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Toyota Celica Toyota Celica 2002 2.8 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2002 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 0 75 75 2.9  
2002 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 mtns lead light 0 0 0 100 80 3.1  
2002 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 3 18 80 65 2.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Celica fuel economy data.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport g/100m

Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 6.3 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 5.4 MPG Highway Percentage 77 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2008 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 6.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Land Rover Range Rover Sport Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 6.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2013 4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat v.lt none 1 9 85 5 70 6.3  
2009 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat light none 3 0 20 77 65 5.4  
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat light none 0 0 20 80 65 5.1  
2006 4dr SUV supercharged 390hp 4.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat lead light 25 25 0 50 75 6.1  
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat med light 5 5 15 75 70 6.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Land Rover Range Rover Sport fuel economy data.

Toyota Celica vs. Land Rover Range Rover Sport Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Toyota Celica and Land Rover Range Rover Sport's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models and Land Rover models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Celica

Toyota Celica Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2002 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Average 33 on the highway going 80+ mph and 30 in the city on regular gas. see full Toyota Celica review
2001 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 get 35-38mpg in summer, and 32+ in rainy winter see full Toyota Celica review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

Be the first!