Toyota Corolla (2013) vs. Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo (2004) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Toyota Corolla and 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo specs.
2013 Toyota Corolla and 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Specifications
| Model Year |
2013 |
2004 |
|
| Model |
Toyota Corolla |
Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Corolla
| 2014 |
The Corolla's specs indicate rear legroom worthy of a large sedan, 41.3 inches, a substantial four more than in the Sentra and five more than in last year's Corolla. To provide this increase, Toyota stretched the car's wheelbase by four inches, taking it from the shortest in the segment to the 106.3-inch dimension shared by the Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, and Nissan. The Ford Focus, with a 104.3-inch wheelbase, is now the briefest of the bunch. The Corolla's overall length has also grown by four inches, to 182.6.
Subjectively, the Corolla's advantage over the Sentra seems about half as large. Still a lot of legroom for a compact, especially in conjunction with a more comfortably positioned seat. Rear seat headroom is in much shorter supply in both cars.
see full Toyota Corolla review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Corolla
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
| 2005 |
4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6
4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof.
see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans and
Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.
