| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser and 2012 Chevrolet Spark Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota FJ Cruiser | Chevrolet Spark | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser
| 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 259-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed manual AWD w/low range |
Rear seats are cramped. Access is awful, with strange half-doors that require front doors to be open before they can be opened. see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
| 2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
