Model Year | 2009 | 2018 | |
Model | Toyota FJ Cruiser | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 239 hp@5200 278 lb-ft@3700 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 105.9 in | 106.2 in | -0.3 in |
Length | 183.9 in | 179.1 in | 4.8 in |
Width | 74.6 in | 72.5 in | 2.1 in |
Height | 70.9 in | 65.3 in | 5.6 in |
Curb Weight | 4050 lb. | 3693 lb. | 357 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 4.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 39.7 in | 1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.4 in | 57.1 in | 1.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 55.2 in | 0.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 41.0 in | 0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 40.3 in | 39.0 in | 1.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 54.8 in | -0.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.0 in | 55.3 in | -4.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 31.3 in | 39.6 in | -8.3 in |
Total Legroom | 73.2 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -7.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 27.9 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.8 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | 7.2 ft3 |
2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV 259-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed manual AWD w/low range |
Rear seats are cramped. Access is awful, with strange half-doors that require front doors to be open before they can be opened. see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 239-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Too stiff and too upright with no adjustments see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 239-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Adults do not fit well in the back seat comfortably, and the rear access doors, while a cool design, lack functionality(no handle to release the door except on the inside) see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review |
2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.