| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser and 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Toyota FJ Cruiser | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 194 kW@5600 367 Nm@4400 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 225 kW@6500 370 Nm@3500 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm | 2,756 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,671 mm | 4,529 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,895 mm | 1,887 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,801 mm | 1,699 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,837 kg | 1,782 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 66 L | 6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,024 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,295 mm | 1,334 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 795 mm | 892 mm | -97 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,859 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 790 L | 660 L | 130 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,892 L | 1,549 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser
| 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 259-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed manual AWD w/low range |
Rear seats are cramped. Access is awful, with strange half-doors that require front doors to be open before they can be opened. see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
