| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser and 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Toyota FJ Cruiser | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@5600 271 lb-ft@4400 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.9 in | 105.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Length | 183.9 in | 183.3 in | 0.6 in |
| Width | 74.6 in | 70.9 in | 3.7 in |
| Height | 70.9 in | 66.1 in | 4.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4050 lb. | 3571 lb. | 479 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 16.6 gal. | 2.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 40.6 in | 0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.4 in | 56.4 in | 2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 52.6 in | 2.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 40.9 in | 1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.3 in | 38.4 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 56.0 in | -2.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.0 in | 51.7 in | -0.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 31.3 in | 37.3 in | -6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.7 in | -35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.6 in | -50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 39.4 in | -39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 28.2 in | -28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 73.2 in (over 2 rows) | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | -33.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 27.9 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 17.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 27.9 | 34.2 ft3 | -6.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.8 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | 3.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser
| 2011 Toyota FJ Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 259-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed manual AWD w/low range |
Rear seats are cramped. Access is awful, with strange half-doors that require front doors to be open before they can be opened. see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
