What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2010
4dr SUV 259-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed manual AWD w/low range
Rear seats are cramped. Access is awful, with strange half-doors that require front doors to be open before they can be opened.
see full Toyota FJ Cruiser review
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru WRX
2016 Subaru WRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year
Comment
2015
The Subaru WRX has always been fun to drive. But it used to be cramped inside, especially in the back seat. This is no longer an issue. The new car has more rear seat legroom than the one-size-up Legacy had during its 2005-2009 glory days. Unless your friends and family are tall, they'll fit in back. While the GTI's back seat is nearly as roomy, the Focus ST's isn't in the same ballpark.
If you want rear air vents for your passengers, though, you'll have to get the VW or the Ford. Subaru doesn't offer them in the WRX.
see full Subaru WRX review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru WRX
2016 Subaru WRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2016
4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L H4 6-speed manual AWD
Anyone whose owned a previous-gen WRX knows rear seat space, especially leg room, as "OK" at best. Subaru has revised the rear seats to where there is now more leg room for the lucky passengers in the rear. With the driver seat adjusted to how I sit (I'm 6-feet tall and have a more upright seating position), there is about 1.5 inches of space between my knees and the driver seat back (vs. no space on the previous gen!). Comfort is pretty good, although the seats take on more of a lean on the seat back, which may/may not jive well with your passengers backs.
see full Subaru WRX review
