Model Year | 2012 | 2011 | |
Model | Toyota Highlander | Dodge Challenger | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,785 mm | 5,022 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,910 mm | 1,923 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,730 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,790 kg | 1,687 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 72 L | 1 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,003 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,516 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,097 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,019 mm | 950 mm | -949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,511 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,435 mm | 1,306 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 828 mm | 145 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 922 mm | 0 mm | 922 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,397 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,074 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 742 mm | 0 mm | 742 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,895 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 292 L | 459 L | -167 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,198 L | 16.2 | -15.2 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,701 L | 16.2 | -14.2 L |
2012 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Perfect for two car seats. Really neat trick - the middle seat for the 2nd row rolls up into the center console. I did not remove it nor attempt to sit in it but that does make the 3rd row more likely to be used for those with car seats. I did not attempt to sit in the 3rd row (looked at it before folding into the floor for cargo space for the entire trip) so cannot opine on it. Use at your own risk. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I am 6 foot tall, and there is plenty of head and leg room in the driving position. Easy access as well. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2012 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
3rd row seats are useless to me. Too little room for adults. Should have been an option for families with small children. With 3rd row seating, you lose storage space. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
2011 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Challenger has tilt/telescope steering wheel that can be positioned exactly where you want see full Dodge Challenger review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
I can set the front seat in a comfortable location for myself and still have room behind me for a rear seat passenger. Seat can be positioned for a more chair-like seating position. see full Dodge Challenger review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Larger/wider back seat with capability of handling modern child seats. Adequate space for occasional adult use of back seat. see full Dodge Challenger review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
With the tilt/telescope steering wheel and the larger interior room vs. its competitors this car is easily adjusted to fit the driver and I get out still feeling good after all-day drives. see full Dodge Challenger review |
2011 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 372-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
While probably OK for short trips, but would not be comfortable for longer cruise even for small passengers see full Dodge Challenger review |