Toyota Highlander Toyota Highlander 2010 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Toyota Highlander (2010) vs. Ford Mustang (2003) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Toyota Highlander and 2003 Ford Mustang specs.

2010 Toyota Highlander and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2010 2003  
Model Toyota Highlander Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Highlander

2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review
2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid
CVT AWD
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review
2009 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Only two seats in the 2nd row, very small leg room in the 3rd row. see full Toyota Highlander review
2009 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
seats were hard and flat. Even top of the line luxury model seats were a big disappointment . . . one of the principal reasons we did not choose this vehicle see full Toyota Highlander review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.