Model Year | 2019 | 2015 | |
Model | Toyota Highlander | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,890 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,925 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,730 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 61 L | 12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,506 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,123 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,450 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 777 mm | 198 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,397 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,158 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,802 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 391 L | 382 L | 9 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,198 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
2019 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2020 | 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 3.5L V6 8-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The 3rd row seating is just not for adults at all, and I'm not certain that children would be easy to fit back there as well. I'm not sure what Toyota was thinking, even making the 2020 longer didn't make any difference at all. My one complaint is it is just TOO SMALL! see full Toyota Highlander review |
2018 | 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 3.5L V6 8-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
3rd row seat is midget sized. Claiming that the Highlander is an 8-passenger vehicle is a lie. It's either 5 normal-sized people, or Snow White and the 7 dwarfs. There is no way you can accommodate 8 normal-sized people comfortably in this car. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.