| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Toyota Highlander and 2015 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota Highlander | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.9 in | 112.5 in | -5.6 in |
| Length | 184.6 in | 185.3 in | -0.7 in |
| Width | 71.9 in | 72.8 in | -0.9 in |
| Height | 67.9 in | 66.3 in | 1.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3516 lb. | 3853 lb. | -337 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.1 gal. | 18.8 gal. | 0.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 39.8 in | 0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.9 in | 55.7 in | 2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 55.1 in | 0 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 41.2 in | -0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 39.2 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.0 in | 55.3 in | 1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.9 in | 51.3 in | 3.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 39.9 in | -3.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 32.3 in | 0.0 in | 32.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 53.2 in | 0.0 in | 53.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 39.8 in | 0.0 in | 39.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 30.2 in | 0.0 in | 30.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | 26.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.5 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -21.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 39.7 ft3 | 31.6 | 8.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 80.6 ft3 | 63.9 ft3 | 16.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Highlander
| 2006 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 215-horsepower 3.3L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Ease of entry and exit and the spacious leg room. see full Toyota Highlander review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 GMC Terrain
| 2015 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
