Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,366 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,560 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 71 L | -21 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 965 mm | 33 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 1,008 mm | 918 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 464 L | 97 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |