| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Toyota Matrix and 2017 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2017 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,351 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,775 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,565 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,215 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 74 L | -24 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,313 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 1,021 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 922 mm | 975 mm | -53 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 617 L | 467 L | 150 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 21.8 | 1,325 L | 20.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,506 L | 2,376 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Toyota Matrix
| 2008 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2008 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
| 2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
