Model Year | 2013 | 2019 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,366 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,560 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 1,606 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 56 L | -6 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 991 mm | 7 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 1,006 mm | 918 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 875 L | -314 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 1,688 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.