Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,366 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,882 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,560 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 1,830 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 80 L | -30 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 917 mm | 81 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 889 mm | 30 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,958 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 433 L | 128 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 15.3 | -14.3 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS.