Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,634 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,366 mm | 4,582 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,763 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,560 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 1,350 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 59 L | -9 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 935 mm | 63 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 912 mm | 7 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,986 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 391 L | 170 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 1,320 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.
2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |