Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Toyota Sienna | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 3,030 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,351 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,775 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,565 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,215 kg | 1,955 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 76 L | -26 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,313 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,641 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 922 mm | 955 mm | -33 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,552 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,906 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 617 L | 1,107 L | 616 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 21.8 | 2,466 L | 19.8 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,506 L | 4,248 L | -3 L |
2007 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
2007 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.