Toyota Prius (2016) vs. Dodge Challenger (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Toyota Prius and 2012 Dodge Challenger specs.
2016 Toyota Prius and 2012 Dodge Challenger Specifications
| Model Year |
2016 |
2012 |
|
| Model |
Toyota Prius |
Dodge Challenger |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Hatch |
2dr Coupe |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
106.3 in |
116.0 in |
-9.7 in |
| Length |
178.7 in |
197.7 in |
-19 in |
| Width |
69.3 in |
75.7 in |
-6.4 in |
| Height |
58.1 in |
57.0 in |
1.1 in |
| Curb Weight |
3075 lb. |
3719 lb. |
-644 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity |
11.3 gal. |
19.0 gal. |
-7.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
39.4 in |
39.5 in |
-0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
55.0 in |
58.2 in |
-3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
53.4 in |
54.7 in |
-1.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
43.2 in |
42.0 in |
1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
37.4 in |
37.4 in |
0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
53.0 in |
53.9 in |
-0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
51.9 in |
51.4 in |
0.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
33.4 in |
32.6 in |
0.8 in |
| Total Legroom |
76.6 in (over 2 rows) |
74.6 in (over 2 rows) |
2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
24.6 ft3 |
16.2 ft3 |
8.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
62.7 ft3 |
16.2 ft3 |
46.5 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
| 2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Dodge Challenger
| 2013 |
2dr Coupe 375-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
I am a large person, being 6'4" tall and about 250 lbs. This car fits me great, with plenty of room and comfort. I am the driver always (I live alone) and don't often have anyone else with me, although on occasion, I have a passenger. Even with large passengers there is plenty of room in the interior. I have a couple of inches of head room, which is pretty unique. Most cars require me to recline the seat a notch or two in order to avoid having my head in the headliner. I DID NOT purchase a vehicle with a sunroof. That device eats up 2 inches of head room, and I would be right there. Besides, we get a lot of rain here on the coast and I would be afraid of leaks.
The seats are supportive, and I have the 6 way power driver's seat. It is easily adjustable for position and has the adjustable lumbar support. I cannot imagine anyone not being able to be comfortable. There is also plenty of leg room in the front seats. The back seats are useful in a pinch, but if I had a family, this would likely not be the best choice of vehicle for me. Although I love driving it, and looking at it!
see full Dodge Challenger review |
| 2012 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 |
2dr Coupe 372-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
While probably OK for short trips, but would not be comfortable for longer cruise even for small passengers
see full Dodge Challenger review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
HatchbacksSee TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.
